Great to see acknowledgement of importance of #patientvoices and human faces for #AMRsurvivors but can we please keep talking about how these are selected, and whether they are representative of the problem overall.
In particular community acquired infections, many treated in sexual health, are a big part of AMR in the NHS / global north but not a big part of the conversation.
What would be the advantages and disadvantages of making them more visible beyond the tired media ‘superbug’ trope trotted out for MDR gonorrhoea?
Would love to hear from patient groups and charities active in sexual health on this issue @THTorguk @BrookCharity @DecoloniseContr and others who might want to get involved in discussing possibilities.
You can follow @AMRinterrupted.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.