True – this chocolate is sugar-free.

Also True – it still has 475cal/100gm. That’s only 82 calories lesser than a regular 55% dark chocolate bar.

Now, one might ask, if all the sugar is removed, how is it that the calories went down by only 15%?

(1/7)
It’s a great question, and it has repercussions for both weight-watchers and diabetics. Let’s talk about both.

First up, how is this sugar-free chocolate almost as sweet as regular 55% dark?

The answer is Maltitol.

(2/7)
Maltitol is a sugar alcohol used to replace the sugar with. It has half the calories of sugar, but as per FSSAI rules isn’t classified as a sugar (but as a carbohydrate). That’s why the calories reduce, but not by much.

(3/7)
For folks counting their calories, a sugar free chocolate might sound like a great, healthy option. Which in turn might prompt over-consumption. But remember, you’re still having 85% calories of regular chocolate.

(4/7)
And for diabetics, sugar-free might lead them to believe that this won’t impact insulin. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.

Table sugar has a GI of 65. Maltitol, GI of 52. That’s just 20% < sugar, high enough to cause serious issues for diabetics.

(5/7)
Truth is “sugar-free” makes food sound healthy, meant to attract health-seeking consumers. Sometimes even diabetics.

But #TheWholeTruth, is that there’s a lot more to sugar-free than meets the eye. So read the label, understand what’s the sugar-substitute, before eating!

(6/7)
(7/7)
You can follow @wholetruthfood.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.