A classic example of the Home Secretary & the Mail’s inability to understand the rule of law.
Aside from the factual error (the letter was signed by Windrush campaigners), the point is:
If the govt is allowed to act unchecked by law or due process, scandals like Windrush occur.
Aside from the factual error (the letter was signed by Windrush campaigners), the point is:
If the govt is allowed to act unchecked by law or due process, scandals like Windrush occur.
If the Home Office is allowed to remove or deport people whom it designates undesirable or “illegal” without there being any independent checks - without those affected being able to ensure the government is acting lawfully - injustice will occur.
That, @pritipatel, is the point
That, @pritipatel, is the point
We should perhaps not be surprised that the Home Secretary struggles with such straightforward legal concepts, given her apparent belief that executing innocent people serves as a “deterrent”. https://twitter.com/barristersecret/status/1154083030954385408