Brizzy sued Vizzy, and the judge said no preliminizzy injunction.

Oh no. Terrible. I'll show myself out. 1/
Oh heaven help me these marketers need to stop.
Law, the discipline where you have to write a paragraph to explain why the nonsense word Brizzy does not tell you anything about the product.
I feel like if you want to argue Brizzy is not related to fizzy, you should not have a slogan about how you should "follow the fizz"
So the notion is you might say you wanted a Brizzy in a bar and they give you a Vizzy? I sense an entire Seinfeld episode here.
Maybe I'm projecting, but I feel like the Court is only barely keeping it together about the prospect of people constantly ordering Brizzy (or Vizzy) in a crowded bar (which of course doesn't even exist now)
Excellent lawyers on both sides as well. Must have been an interesting case to litigate.
You can follow @RMFifthCircuit.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.