Read on Twitter
THREAD ON THE STRATEGIC LOGIC BEHIND THE GLOBALIST-CHINESE ALLIANCE:
Firstly, it must be recognized that Power is always a complimentary synthesis of two main processes, sabotage and dependency. Power sabotages vectors of independent social organization to secure dependency.
Firstly, it must be recognized that Power is always a complimentary synthesis of two main processes, sabotage and dependency. Power sabotages vectors of independent social organization to secure dependency.
Secondly, there are two fundamentally conflictual geostrategic logics; Land Power and Sea Power. Sea Power thrives off of open trade flows which connect metropolitan markets to foreign resources and production, Land Power thrives off securing local resources and production.
Notice then the hybrid nature of the world's two great powers, the US and China. Both have strong security appartuses which protect large territories for resource extraction and production, yet both have major metropolitical centers which are key conduits for international trade.
Yet what differentiates them is that the US has the world's largest, most interconnected and fertile agricultural basin, and plentiful natural resources of all kinds. China lacks the same magnitude in its capacity to produce agriculturally and extract resources, including oil.
This means that China is more reliant upon Sea Power geostrategy, far more in need of trade to procure natural resources in particular. This has made it difficult for China historically to centralize control over its territory against rivals which leverage this dependency.
Historically, China's choice has been to either brutally secure centralized control over its territory despite economic catastrophe OR face usurpation by trade partners who gain political leverage in its main port-cities. Self-sabotage or dependency.
The rise of China then required this paradox to be solved, and it was solved by the US. As the world's most powerful Sea Power, it gave the Chinese access to global markets without (seriously) threatening its internal instability. China has been having its cake and eating it too.
Of course, the Chimerica economy was established as a means of containing a potential Russian/Soviet expansion of its sphere of influence into East Asia. The Chinese likely arent stupid and knew this was a limited window of opportunity.
There was a second aspect to economic integration with China, though. One not related to the Cold War but moreso with the internal geopolitics of the US. Unlike China, the US is not geostrategically reliant upon Sea Power, its natural abundance means it can THRIVE in autarky.
And autarky (trade protectionism/foreign policy non-interventionism) was more or less the default setting in US politics prior to WW2 for this reason. The US was drawn into Sea Power strategy mainly through anxieties about a totalitarian superstate forming in Eurasia.
In using the Sea Power strategy to essentially set up a technocratic superstructure designed to unleash Capital from containment by Land Power geostrategy on a global scale, the US had to subjugate its own basis for Land Power to incentivize global economic integration.
Again, it is likely that Capital's elite class of investors, now unleashed from geopolitical limitation realized this was a limited window of opportunity. So, both the Globalists and the CCP possess a mutual existential threat, a reawakening ot American Land Power geostrategy.
If the US re-embrace protectionism and retrenchment/non-inventionism, the Chinese would face an unshackled Russia and a Middle Eastern power vacuum. A perfect storm they lack the capability to discipline without great expense, an expense currently paid by the US.
China is dependent upon the Middle East for oil, various US allies to import other natural resources, and the US itself as a consumption market to export the products of its manufacturing to. You take all of that away and China both needs AND can't afford to radically expand.
Meanwhile, many large "American" corporations would be forced to accept brutal tax hikes and pay higher wages to American workers in order to remain in the US as there would be nowhere for Capital to flee to with the requisite Chinese collapse and global instability.
Whilst most of the US (the Heartland) would stand to gain immensely from such a realignment, coastal elites who rule the metropolitan conduits for global capital would lose their political hegemony. A donor class allied with Land Power geostrategy would rise to usurp them.
And thus, the unholy alliance of the CCP, global capital and the coastal elites who constitute the donor class behind the Democrat party was born. Hence their politics of sabotage toward the political independence and economic thriving of the US Heartland.
Ok so what is with these Great Reset lockdown things then, why do the Paris Accords and Agenda 2030 targets asymmetrically punish the US and its sphere of influence whilst imposing basically no penalities on China? Why did the neocons all back Beijing Biden? Now you know.
Sabotage that which isnt dependent, centralize power within a political, economic and technological web of interdependence, rinse repeat. That is how the Chinese-Globalist axis operate and why Heartland America (the most capable people of INDEPENDENCE) is their main enemy.
