Who on my timeline today was talking about John Brennan and the fact he had transmitted "knowledge of Trump associates talking to Russians", which was characterized as curious since "only such associate was @carterwpage"?
For reference: https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/984849305939853313?s=20
Brennan’s intelligence “served as the basis for the FBI investigation”. 🤔 https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/984852091087634433?s=20
"GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious interactions”

"Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians."

All of this PRECEDED Carter Page, Papa Predicate, etc.
QUESTIONS: given:

1) new revelation that Durham focus has "considerably narrowed to FBI", &
2) only comment from Durham EVER is to rebuke Horowitz conclusions re: CFH was 'adequately predicated', &
3) we've just shown that Brennan "served as basis for" CFH,

THEN...
1) how is Brennan in the clear?
2) why is this portion of pre-CFH never discussed?
3) who is persons in T "inner circle" communicating w Russians? (hint: only Michael Cohen & Felix Sater fit the timeframe)
You can follow @MonsieurAmerica.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.