Read on Twitter
It is abundantly clear after listening to the line of questioning by @elenaparent that she has a significant listening & legal/constitutional comprehension problem. After @DrJohnEastman recites several GA electoral statutes that were broken during the 2020 election, she starts
2/ off her questioning by asking him what statutes were broken [that would result in a failed election]. @DrJohnEastman repeats those statutes [registering 16-17 year olds to vote more than 1 year before the election, allowing felons to vote, reducing the signature verification
3/ requirements on absentee ballots, failure to check voter identity & more]. @elenaparent then inadvertently exposes how the Consent Decree [illegally] entered into by Governor Kemp & SoS Raffenberger made the absentee ballot signature verification process LESS SECURE by only
4/ requiring signature verification during one part of the absentee ballot process [as opposed to two, which is required by the GA election code]. She then claims that she hasn’t seen any evidence of the claims being made [perhaps because she isn’t looking?] — Note: this is
5/ the same representative who asked for evidence of election fraud occurring in State Farm Arena after being shown direct video evidence of Republican poll workers being sent home after they were told the count was being paused, only to have multiple people stay behind & process
6/ ballots in secret for multiple hours. Nevertheless, for her Final Act, she once again butchers the law and says that [since she hasn’t seen the evidence], they would need to have: court intervention, a successful lawsuit, the State Elections Board take action, etc. — for the
7/ legislature to be given the authority to send the electors of their choosing, because currently the GA Election Law requires that the electors be chosen for the candidate with the most votes. @DrJohnEastman calmly reminds her that she is [once again] incorrect. When a
8/ candidate receives the most votes in an election that hasn’t been conducted according to state law, you don’t have a valid election, so those rules no longer apply. The Constitution then clearly gives the state legislature the authority. He then cites the FL legislature making
9/ that decision [which is their sole authority under Article II] without any court intervention, lawsuit victory, etc. in a similar case.
This should be pretty clear to anyone who passed high school. It doesn’t matter if a marathon runner had the fastest time if they broke the
This should be pretty clear to anyone who passed high school. It doesn’t matter if a marathon runner had the fastest time if they broke the
10/ rules [law], hitched a ride on scooter for the last 5 miles and broke through the ticker-tape before everyone else, the race is invalid.
The following phrase comes to mind w/ regard to Ms. Parent after watching that exchange.
“Always wrong, but never in doubt”.
The following phrase comes to mind w/ regard to Ms. Parent after watching that exchange.
“Always wrong, but never in doubt”.
