So in regards to the #NevadaVote when it comes to #Election2020results & #ElectionFruad, there's a big lawsuit making it's way through the state right now that has a very good chance of altering the results here in the state. It has to do with the Agilis ballot counting machines.

For reference, you can see the lawsuit here.
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/nov-17-doc-2.pdf

Here's the jist of the lawsuit. Basically, in August, the powers that be in #Nevada decide to send out millions of mail-in ballots to everyone in the state, whether they requested them or not. They did not prepare their vote counting people for the massive influx of votes.

Normally, around 80,000 mail-in ballots. In #elections2020 they received close to 700,000 #NevadaVotes. Far beyond their capability to verify. (NV law requires signatures on mail-in ballots be matched.)

So Clark County, in its infinite wisdom, unilaterally decide to use signature matching machines to verify signatures instead of election personnel. They us Agilis Ballot Sorting Systems to do this. However, there was a problem.

The machines use DMV signature records to match the ballot signatures to. But the machines require a minimum resolution of 200 dpi of the source image to make a match. The DMV keeps signature records at far below that resolution.

Because of this, when the votes were fed into the machine, they had a rejection rate of upward of 70%. When this issue was presented to #ClarkCounty election officials, their response was to turn the sensitivity of the machine's AI software down far below recommendations.

We're talking FAR below the recommended sensitivity. Almost to zero. As a result, the Agilis machines went from rejecting 70% of votes to rejecting almost 0% of votes. #ClarkCounty "verified" around 130,000 votes in this way.

Thus, the Agilis machines (illegally) replaced election personnel in the signature verification process of 130,000 mail-in ballots. The machines were used in contrast to other states which use them to flag the most obvious signature discrepancies so that personnel can review them

The lawsuit argues that the Agilis machines malfunctioned & made it inherently unreliable from a scientific perspective for unilaterally approving or rejecting signatures using its artificial intelligence protocols.

Despite these obvious issues, #Nevada election officials relied exclusively on these machines to verify over 130,000 mail-in ballot signatures without any further review of said ballots by trained election personnel.

The margin of difference between #TrumpvsBiden in the #NevadaElection was 33,596 votes. We have 130,000 unverified ballots counted by the Agilis machines with almost 0% rejection rate after a malfunctioning 70% rejection rate.

At the very least, these 130,000 ballots need to be manually reviewed and audited. But knowing how corrupt #Sisolak & #ClarkCounty officials, as well as the Harry Reid machine, are, we'll see if anything actually happens here. But this is no small issue.

The lawsuit covers a vast array of voting issues and #fraud in #Nevada but this signature verification issue is probably the most easily provable & fixable. If even a small percentage of those 130k votes are eliminated, it could have a big impact on on the #2020Election.

@OMBReport @GeeksGamersCom @reviewjournal @LasVegasSun @FOX5Vegas - can this get some coverage? It's a pretty big deal.