I'm sorry: I was under the impression that Oster didn't think she should be cited as an authority on COVID and schools (which is correct)?
Why is she then quoted in the @BostonGlobe today as "a leading researcher on school COVID cases"?
Why is she then quoted in the @BostonGlobe today as "a leading researcher on school COVID cases"?
Also, I'm still waiting for those being cited public health side to catch up with the latest from the UK, not to mention what's in this @usnews commentary: https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2020-12-02/shut-them-down-why-schools-might-not-be-safe-during-covid-19
Sorry, the Globe article (featuring the sartorial stylings of Supt Malone) is here https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/12/02/metro/public-health-experts-advise-keeping-schools-open-superintendents-grapple-with-logistics-politics-second-wave/
It also contrasts a bit strangely with this https://www.wgbh.org/news/education/2020/12/02/mass-deploys-mobile-testing-unit-to-school-clusters-in-13-cities-and-towns
...which also just has all sorts of weirdness going on...
And also, of course, this: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2020/12/children_account_for_more_new_COVID_19.html