1/6 Let's have a look to the Tiananmen Myth
Western journalists who were there never reported any massacre, it's the channels that they worked for that did it
Here is a BBC article explicitly mentioning the hoax
Source http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8057762.stm
Western journalists who were there never reported any massacre, it's the channels that they worked for that did it
Here is a BBC article explicitly mentioning the hoax
Source http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8057762.stm
2/6 Wikileaks published the cables from US embassy in Beijing
«Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim» https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html
«Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim» https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html
3/6 Here is an interview of western journalist who witnessed the event, and doesn't mention any Tiananmen «Pro-Democracy» protestors «massacre» but rather insists on the lynching of soldiers by "the mob"
[as you will later see, this version is the predominant one]
[as you will later see, this version is the predominant one]
4/6 Few of the photos of the mob attacking soldiers, taking their tanks, burning them alive and lynching them, as referred in previous video
5/6 In this article, a genuine question is being asked "Which Tiananmen Narrative is True?" with the author obviously giving clues about the answer but remaining neutral https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/06/06/commentary/world-commentary/tiananmen-narrative-true/
6/6 "Tiananmen: The Massacre that Wasn’t"
This article leaves no place for speculation, accurately detailing who said what, to create the myth of the Tiananmen massacre as well as showing «Pro-Democracy» leaders being linked to the US regime-change machine https://www.liberationnews.org/tiananmen-the-massacre-that-wasnt/
This article leaves no place for speculation, accurately detailing who said what, to create the myth of the Tiananmen massacre as well as showing «Pro-Democracy» leaders being linked to the US regime-change machine https://www.liberationnews.org/tiananmen-the-massacre-that-wasnt/
1/5 PART 2 CIA, NED & VOA
«what was remarkable was not just that the meeting [between Chai Ling, Wu’er Kaixi, Wang Dan, Feng Congde etc. and CPC leaders] took place but that the Government televised nearly all of it» The New York Times https://thegeopolitics.com/the-geopolitics-behind-the-tiananmen-square-incident/
«what was remarkable was not just that the meeting [between Chai Ling, Wu’er Kaixi, Wang Dan, Feng Congde etc. and CPC leaders] took place but that the Government televised nearly all of it» The New York Times https://thegeopolitics.com/the-geopolitics-behind-the-tiananmen-square-incident/
2/5 Chai Ling gave an interview to US journalist Philip Cunningham on May 28, just before being evacuated to Hong Kong through CIA's Operation Yellowbird «what we are actually hoping for is bloodshed»
3/5 «The “National Endowment for Democracy” had been funding the student protestors since at least 1985, fanning the flames of the most extremist anti-government sentiments» https://leohezhao.medium.com/notes-for-30th-anniversary-of-tiananmen-incident-f098ef6efbc2
4/5 The most detailed article of the full CIA operation
«Luckily the CPC were able to thwart the machinations of Zhao's puppet-master George Soros of color revolution fame. What would China be like today if Zhao Ziyang had retained power?» https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/the-truth-behind-the-myth-of-the-tiananmen-square-massacre-opinion-piece-by-dr-dennis-etler
«Luckily the CPC were able to thwart the machinations of Zhao's puppet-master George Soros of color revolution fame. What would China be like today if Zhao Ziyang had retained power?» https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/the-truth-behind-the-myth-of-the-tiananmen-square-massacre-opinion-piece-by-dr-dennis-etler
5/5 Aftermath of the failed CIA operation «The Bush administration favored trade with China, and less than four weeks after [Tiananmen], US envoys went to China to tell Beijing that America wanted good relations»
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010603/aponline131727_000.htm
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010603/aponline131727_000.htm