Read on Twitter
If you find yourself in an argument about election fraud always begin the discussion by asking people to define, beforehand, what they consider "evidence." Make them define their threshold before you show them the evidence you have, so they can't keep changing the goalposts.
So for example, if they say they expect video evidence, then reject the footage of shredding trucks in Georgia because they can't prove it's authenticity, then ask them to explain why they set a threshold that now they are rejecting.
If they say they want evidence specific to the location where ballots were handled tell them the video came from a ballot processing center. If they then say they have to see video taken in the processing center during the counting, explain that election officials barred cameras.
You have to make them define their standards so they are finally forced to concede that their definition of evidence is irrational. If they say affidavits don't count, ask them if they reject eyewitness testimony in rape and harassment cases too.
If they start bringing up what the courts, governors, or Bill Barr said first, fact-check their characterization of these parties' statements. Then remind them that you asked them to define their standard of evidence, not other people's. And bring up "citizen journalists."
If they keep repeating that courts have rejected claims about fraud, ask them to recount how much of the evidence that is public was actually presented in court. Then ask them if the judiciary's bias is to be brushed off when dealing with racial injustice in the justice system.
If they say they want proof of numbers being switched around, then tell them that districts in Michigan and Georgia have already conceded that thousands of votes were misapplied to Biden. If they say that's not a lot, ask them to define how big numbers must be to clear their bar.
If they say they need to see evidence of hundreds of thousands of votes being switched, refer them to the 21 hours (and running) of hearings in state legislatures where witnesses saw thousands of ballots being criminally mishandled, and refer to the forensic analysis of millions.
