Compounder Finance Post-Mortem Report

https://simpleaswater.com/cp3r 

See the full report for a better explanation.

See thread for summary 👇
Assets Rugged (8):

1. 8,077.540667 Wrapped Ether ($4,820,030.07)

2. 1,300,610.936154161964594323 yearn: yCRV Vault ($1,521,714.80)

3. 0.016390153857154838 Compound (COMP) ($1.79)

4. 105,102,172.66293264 Compound USDT ($2,169,782.85)
Assets Rugged (8):

5. 97,944,481.39815207 Compound USD Coin ($2,096,403.68)

6. 1,934.23347357 Compound Wrapped BTC ($744,396.89)

7. 23.368131489683158482 Aave Interest bearing YFI ($628,650.174379401)

8. 6,230,432.06773805 Compound Uniswap ($466,378.99)
We're still investigating, and we might add more addresses here. If you find something, feel free to reach out via DM.
They did mention their concern about the centralization in Compounder Finance in their audit report ( https://solidity.finance/audits/CP3R/ ) and the TG chat ( https://solidity.finance/audits/CP3R/ChatLogs.pdf).

To some extent, the whole DeFi ecosystem has the responsibility to work together to prevent such rug-pulls.
How to be safe from such rug-pulls?

Timelocks should not be trusted as a method to prevent rug pulls. If used anyway, an automated alert system or dashboard should be put in place to monitor transactions at that address.
Moreover, as highlighted here, 24 hours appears to be insufficient to provide enough warning for users to remove funds.
Not all projects with anonymous founders are scams. But nearly all scams are projects with anonymous founders. As a community, we need to be warier of anonymous founders going forward; especially those who use untraceable sources of funds like http://Tornado.cash .
What should we learn from this as a community?

The mere existence of an audit report should not be sufficient to convince users to invest in or assure them of a projects' safety and legitimacy.
Audits often focus on risks from external attackers more than from internal ones - and this is likely an issue within the community that auditors need to improve upon.
Moreover, auditors often do not explain issues in a way the average DeFi user can understand - this is another area for improvement.
It is not wise to chase high APYs into small or suspect projects. Obtaining a *sustainable* APY above 5% is difficult in the current financial environment; any project offering higher APYs should be viewed with some level of suspicion.
The project team has the ability to wreak havoc in nearly any project users invest in. Whether it be through the minting of tokens, dumping private supply, or clever contract swaps as we see here, risks to users almost always exist.
You can follow @vasa_develop.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.