To whom?
Given that under 60s with no pre-existing conditions (the majority) are at a statistical risk from C19 close to zero (just over 300 fatalities), that cannot be true for them.
It is a basic ethical duty for doctors to explain the risks v benefits to each individual. https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1334084332500226049

How can *anyone* on the MHRA bd be permitted to have any interests in pharmaceuticals? This declaration cannot prevent those interests influencing their decisions on policy,even if they excuse themselves from licensing bsnss in which they hv interests. https://twitter.com/Latics/status/1334097011826626562?s=20

This is an extraordinary reminder from history that we have been here before - and the most irrational and extreme state in the world is repeating its behaviour from 100 years ago: https://twitter.com/germ_nation14/status/1308428022182109185?s=20