The SCOTUS 2000 election ruling was to insure all votes were treated equally under the 14th amendment equal protection clause.
(14th amendment... important)

2) They quoted “O]nce the franchise is granted to the electorate, lines may not be drawn which are inconsistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”.

3) It must be remembered that “the right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote”

The vote counting in Atlanta (Fulton county) had both unequal protection and dilution of votes, violating one vote per person requirement.

4) Unequal protection:

Only Democrat poll watchers were allowed to examine ballots.
Republican poll watchers were excluded.
Republican voter rights received unequal protection.

Vote dilution:

After dubious claims of a water leak, tens of thousands of votes were delivered, received, and counted by only Democrat workers.

The counting was done in secret, after Republican watchers were sent home for the ‘leak’.

Unequal protection and vote dilution clearly occurred.

Many Additional charges of voter fraud, backed by affidavits, occurred as well.

Georgia officials have refused to uphold 14th amendment equal protection of voting rights when they refused to allow Republican poll watchers to be close enough to validate signatures on questionable ballots.

Then refused to recount with proper signature vetting.

Georgia officials again refused to remedy the equal protection violations by repeatedly denying Republican requests to fully recount by hand WITH an equal number of Republican watchers validating signatures.

Georgia officials then (for the 3rd time) refused to provide equal protection by certifying a clearly and rightfully contested vote total.

This intentionally refused any remedy to insure equal protection of Republican voters (poll watchers).

Georgia officials have repeatedly and intentionally refused to honor the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

And continue to do so even now.
By allowing vote machines to be ‘updated’ and moved, for example.

After the Civil War, the Insurrection Act was amended to give the president authority to enforce the 14th Amendment and the conditions of Reconstruction in the South. That authority is now found in Section 253 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code...

which gives the president the right to take military action within a state when “any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law...

and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, FAIL , or REFUSE to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection. https://www.history.com/news/insurrection-act-thomas-jefferson-aaron-burr

Presidential authority to enforce the Insurrection Act clearly has merit in these swing state cases.

If used solely to protect Republican voter’s right to equal protection, it would be PROTECTING voters from state corruption and tyranny.

Indeed, Trump MUST invoke the Insurrection Act for the specific purpose of protecting our sacred right to vote.

No military personnel need be present at first.

Invoking the Insurrection Act can be done without sending a single federal resource to the states.

These corrupt state politicians must be made aware their corrupt acts will no longer be tolerated.

If they refuse to remedy the situation, Feds can seize all evidence.

Then they can exit peacefully, leaving state representatives to deal with the problem of selecting electors.

Make the state politicians clean up their own mess.