Here's a 3-part axiom I think US defense thinkers & planners should consider in devising concepts for the defense of US/allied vital interests in the Western Pacific.

Plans for major conflict against the PLA should not rely on any of the following to win:
- Units or forces that require anything but episodic communication or data flow.

(Ex.: UxVs that rely on consistent human oversight to do their job, esp. given current policy restraints on lethal autonomous weapons.)
- Any important fixed and hard-to-repair object or facility on or within the 2nd island chain.

(Ex.: fuel tanks, HQ buildings, repair facilities, comms equipment, etc.)
- Assuming politics may require letting the PLA shoot first, any non-stealthy & non-dispersed platforms within IRBM range of China when the shooting starts.

(Ex.: aircraft on the ground, valuable ships within ASBM range, non-dispersed BMD assets. They may survive, but may not.)
N.B.: part 3 is specific to the beginning of a conflict, when the PLA has a peacetime-quality targeting picture, and may not apply to forces brought in after conflict has begun and PRC C4ISR has been degraded.
You can follow @tshugart3.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.