Read on Twitter
the problem we're having is that the current iteration of the internet is inherently feminine, and what is expressed and understood as neutral, "cultural" issues, are a product of everyone being forced within inter-female discourse, something we don't quite yet have a word for https://twitter.com/RadByReality/status/1333845405646274561
it's difficult to express the problem exactly. because it's a confusion between what is "concrete" and "real", and what is "etheral" and "psychological", which we don't have a set dictionary for expressing without the statement being equally difficult
basically, if you can imagine such a thing, all of the real world, external from all psychological judgements and so on, now takes place within a bubble of inter-female communication. what we percieve and treat as a cultural artifact, is, for lack of a better term, a "Gossip"
we musn't understand these things as, "trying to adopt woke blah blah blah". it's not a political statement. the content of the message is entirely superfleus, and it cannot be understood literally, because that's not the point
it doesn't matter whether a given thing is true or false, the only thing that matters is the impact, emotional for lack of better term, you have on *other women*. that's what all "postmodernism" is, what everything boils down to.
paradigms as "true/false" "accurate/inaccurate" etc, are, *whether true or not, whether better or not, whether more useful or not*, inapplicable. I'm not saying this to CONVINCE you - convincing is also a useless paradigm.
we are currently, because of the iphone and the design philosophies of the entire "app" structure, ALWAYS-ALREADY within Gossip. There is no way of escaping this, if you interact with any "cultural artefact", because it is built right into the structure that enables it.
furthermore it is for this reason that the only true political question of the day is the women question
we are presented with a world that is within the female weltanschau, and the reason everything is stupid and doesnt make sense and irratates you, is because you are being incentivised to think like a woman. the internet makes you gay and it's a feature not a bug
imagine you don't care about whether anything you say is true or not, imagine that isn't even a real thing to you, it's beyond consideration, it's so unreal you haven't ever even heard about it and you could imagine it if you tried. grok this mindset
she doesn't care about whether she's whateverthefuck, she cares ONLY that it's efficient towards some end, which is opaque and unknown to us. presumably someone in her personal life annoyed her somehow and this is somehow getting one over on her, by being more hip or whatever
it's not that she's "lying for attention" - lying as a concept doesn't exist. she's just, "for attention"
"fake news" wasn't only "coined by hillary clinton", it's literally the most ancient form of the female mindset. donald trump and perspectivism and relativism didn't kill "objective truth and certainty", forcing all human cognition to take place within-interfemale-gossip did
"it's only as true as it is useful"
this is why I say all advertisement is "towards women", the "intended reader" for all advertisement is a woman. and thanks to the structure of internet-mega-companies, whose entire business is built on shaky, inflated, add-revenue models, is that literally everything is an add
read my blog subscribe to my etc etc etc
you know why 10 years of owning the libs online did absolutely nothing and cia world order is stronger than ever? you thought you were playing "truth or dare" when you were playing Gossip, and you don't even know the rules
the internet is run 100% on add money. where does that value come from? why is this economically viable? How does the investment turn a profit?
silicon valley is a hub for advertisement firms, not for "technology". calling it technology is just, advertisement
