As predicted, Montgomery v Lanarkshire (there's a typo in the ruling here) proving critical.

Those complaining this case will be used to dilute Gillick Competency need to read the ruling.

#IStandWithKeiraBell

This is why puberty blockers cannot be compared to the contraceptive pill.

And also:

No wonder the Fox killer has said an appeal is pointless. There's no argument against this:

Again, this is really, really not like accessing contraceptives:

Now onto those aged 16-17. As pointed out ad nauseam elsewhere, the relevant legislation is the Family Law Reform Act 1969.

Very clear conclusions