Scientific racists are called racist because they claim "black" people as a separate biological type of humans who are inferior genetically.

Whether they believe their "inferiors" deserve equal legal rights is irrelevant to them being acknowledged as racist.

I'm writing this because I frequently see the argument that it's "the consequences" that we're claiming is the racism. Nope. It's the belief in black genetic inferiority itself.

Finally, the pretence of "we don't mean inferiority over all, we just mean that their brains don't work as well as other different types of humans, and that makes them not the best in society, you know" is almost just as insulting. Our brains work well enough to see through that.

You know, I had a tweet here reiterating why science and reality doesn't support their racist beliefs, but you know what, they don't merit a debate on this one.

Those who dress their racism in flowery words have always been worse than the local neo-Nazi idiot. Recognize that.

This thread was inspired by a scientific racist who thought it unfair that black people wouldn't take his views about the best way for "us" to fight racism seriously.

I'm not listening to a crocodile about the best path through the swamp either.