Good example of why I think news publishers should be wary of rewriting press releases from the authorities:

A @metpoliceuk press release published upon conviction implied that two defendants trafficked and controlled a woman's sex work for gain: https://news.met.police.uk/images/wai-tsang-and-wenwen-pan-2092208
But the couple were acquitted of those two charges against the young woman

They were found guilty of people trafficking and controlling prostitution in relation to other women, subject to different charges

The Met's release implies jurors convicted the couple of trafficking her
It states her allegations as fact, her experience may have happened, but jurors didn't find it proved, I wouldn't dare writing such an article

It's inaccurate and defamatory

The press release was rewritten and published by a couple of news outlets:
I admit, I'm bitter that no one bought my story, but happily gobbled up the Met's press release without questioning it in the slightest

This is why news on criminal justice must not rely on press releases from the authorities

Police should police

Prosecutors should prosecute
What's the point in the open justice principle if reporters don't actually go to court to report first hand?

London is a city of 10m odd people, but the only crown court with reporters on a daily basis is the Old Bailey
You can follow @jshmellor.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.