Read on Twitter
It hurts my Jewish community when people ban Labour members from supporting Jeremy Corbyn. If Starmer & Evans want to do what's right for the Jewish community, they will allow CLP to debate motions demanding the whip is restored and no confidence in Starmer & Evans.
We have learned:
Jewish community = Jews who hate Jeremy Corbyn.
Jews who can be ignored, fake Jews, asajews, kapo's, etc = Jews who support Jeremy Corbyn.
Bad enough when the Jewish leadership alienate us from our shuls, families, and identities, but why should the Goyim also?
Jewish community = Jews who hate Jeremy Corbyn.
Jews who can be ignored, fake Jews, asajews, kapo's, etc = Jews who support Jeremy Corbyn.
Bad enough when the Jewish leadership alienate us from our shuls, families, and identities, but why should the Goyim also?
Labour donor David Abrahams and Peter Mandelson's EHRC remarks are cases in point.
David Abrahams hates me, because I have the "wrong" views "despite" being Jewish, so he and his ilk project their hatred and claim it is in fact me who hates me.
David Abrahams hates me, because I have the "wrong" views "despite" being Jewish, so he and his ilk project their hatred and claim it is in fact me who hates me.
Naturally he is attracted to the Starmer project.
Starmer of course wishes to ingratiate himself and his party with the likes of the Jewish Labour Movement and the Board of Deputies for British Jews.
These organizations primarily act as gatekeepers for the Jews of Britain.
Starmer of course wishes to ingratiate himself and his party with the likes of the Jewish Labour Movement and the Board of Deputies for British Jews.
These organizations primarily act as gatekeepers for the Jews of Britain.
One has to be a Zionist to join the JLM, yet they scream the loudest if a Jew claims to be both non-Zionist and demand representation to the Labour Party.
The BoD, while never being entirely right-wing, nonetheless faced huge difficulty even allowing left-Zionist Jews...
The BoD, while never being entirely right-wing, nonetheless faced huge difficulty even allowing left-Zionist Jews...
like Yachad any representation.
This was the organization which 100 years ago ousted senior representatives David Lindo Alexander and CG Montefiore, no radicals they, for their anti-Zionist beliefs.
No wonder the Chareidim never even sought representation.
This was the organization which 100 years ago ousted senior representatives David Lindo Alexander and CG Montefiore, no radicals they, for their anti-Zionist beliefs.
No wonder the Chareidim never even sought representation.
Peter Mandelson, unlike Jeremy Corbyn, openly expressed his rejection of the EHRC Reports recommendations. Seemingly Angela Rayner has done the same. Yet their comments, far being a reason to be suspended from the party or even to lose the whip, are seen as the "correct"...
response to the EHRC report.
This is because, certainly as far as the Starmerites (and possibly even the EHRC themselves) are concerned, the exercise was never about making the Labour Party a safer environment for Jews in terms of actually dealing with actual antisemitism -
This is because, certainly as far as the Starmerites (and possibly even the EHRC themselves) are concerned, the exercise was never about making the Labour Party a safer environment for Jews in terms of actually dealing with actual antisemitism -
and make no mistake, nobody is harassed, and nobody feels harassed, by motions protesting Corbyn's suspension or of no confidence in Starmer and David Evans, whatever some people are saying - but in furthering the war of the Jewish establishment against the "wrong" Jews...
i.e., the anti-Zionist and Socialist Jews, the Jews who do not couch their criticisms of Israel in the most gentle and self-censored of terms.
And non-Jews may not express their solidarity with these Jews either.
For we know that if the Nazis were marching up Cable Street...
And non-Jews may not express their solidarity with these Jews either.
For we know that if the Nazis were marching up Cable Street...
once again - not that far-fetched a likelihood, whatever the Jewish Chronicle and their Spectatorite mates say - Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters would be the first non-Jews defending us.
Starmer? He'd probably abstain.
The fact that David Abrahams is an Islamophobe...
Starmer? He'd probably abstain.
The fact that David Abrahams is an Islamophobe...
as well, not surprising for an establishment figure, would probably only reinforce the idea that Labour is "winning back the white working class", because we know what the media and powers that be think of Muslims and our other "minorities".
Because the "right kind of Jew" is now inexorably liked to the establishment, of which Starmer, a QC and member of Trilateral Commission, is desperate to be, along with the JLM, BoD, etc., and we, the "wrong Jews", are unapologetically not, and a thorn in their ambitions.
And this is proved by the disproportionate way the "Labour antisemitism" efforts are targeting Jews https://twitter.com/jewssf/status/1333922896893407232
