Read on Twitter
The evidence for a 'rigged' election is so preposterous as of late that it's difficult to argue that any series of reforms would have avoided this mess
You've got folks convinced that there were more votes than people in Detroit. All you have to do is do is google search 'detroit population' and 'detroit election results 2020' to learn that it's wrong
You've got folks convinced that there were fewer mail ballot requests than mail votes in Pennsylvania. A google search can disabuse you here, as well--and worst of all this was clear before the election
You've got folks convinced there's something strange about 'vote dumps'--AKA, populous jurisdictions reporting their results. If you've got an issue with it... you just have an issue with them having results...
I can keep going here. The point is that the case for 'fraud' is so bad that it's quite clear it only exists for one reason: they don't like the result. Nothing could have been done to avoid this, and that was obvious even before the '16 election--before the mail surge.
If we had an election where every state had photo ID, in-person voting, and reported all of its results at once we would be in... exactly the same place
The president of a very large country in North America said it, among others, and it's not true for registered voters either https://twitter.com/billy65gt/status/1332809897520418816?s=20
But since many of you are too lazy to do the prescribed google searches, let me help you
None of these are Detroit, which had 49% turnout. They're not even in Michigan. They're Minnesota--google them!
Now why over 100% in Minnesota? The state has same day registration (unlike MI), so you can get more voters than pre-election registrants
https://twitter.com/BeLikeMikeDaily/status/1332811199701016584?s=20
Now why over 100% in Minnesota? The state has same day registration (unlike MI), so you can get more voters than pre-election registrants
https://twitter.com/BeLikeMikeDaily/status/1332811199701016584?s=20
