Thread by @cancerphysicist, Is there a radiation dose-response relationship for rectal cancer managed non-surgically? Short [...]

Is there a radiation dose-response relationship for rectal cancer managed non-surgically?

Short answer: Yes - at least based on published patient series 
Longer answer: See our #ESTRO2020 Poster Highlight - or thread below  

#rectalcancer  #radonc
https://www.postersessiononline.eu/173580348_eu/congresos/ESTRO2020/aula/preposter_771572351_3.png

Non-operative management of rectal cancer is becoming increasingly important - more and more patients are offered observation instead of surgery if they have a complete response after (chemo-)radiotherapy #radonc #ESTRO2020

Most published series are only reporting on that select group of patients - the ones who got a complete response. That's great if we want to understand if observation is a safe strategy for those patients #ESTRO2020 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31078-X/fulltext

Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in...

This dataset has the largest series of patients with rectal cancer treated with a W&W approach, consisting of approximately 50% data from previous cohort series and 50% unpublished data. Local...

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31078-X/fulltext

But it doesn't tell us how large a proportion of *all treated* patients can get long term control without surgery. Or really give us any robust information as to whether we can increase that number by altering our treatment up front #ESTRO2020 #radonc

We are particularly interested in whether dose escalation has a role to play!

I've previously explained why dose escalation to the primary tumour probably doesn't help much in the neoadjuvant setting:
https://twitter.com/cancerphysicist/status/1330194799195009031

But how about for organ preservation? #ESTRO2020

https://twitter.com/cancerphysicist/status/1330194799195009031

We systematically searched the literature for studies of non-operative management of rectal cancer; which:
1) Included the total patient cohort treated, not just those managed with observation
2) Reported the dose to tumour
3) Reported total proportion without surgery at 2 years

Now, out of the 15 papers that we found, 6 of them didn't systematically screen patients for complete response. So we couldn't trust that they actually allowed everybody to avoid surgery who could do so - i.e. their estimate of 'proportion managed without surgery' will be biased

One more tricky part: Some of the patient cohorts were treated with brachy or Papillon boosts - so estimating the tumour dose wasn't super easy ...
#ESTRO2020 #medphys

For one cohort, I actually had MRI-based dose plans, so getting exact EQD2 doses was possible. And for another (Papillon) cohort, I got information on tumour thickness and individual prescriptions + applicators - so I could estimate the average tumour EQD2
#ESTRO2020 #medphys

For others, I did a lot of approximations, based on average cohort tumour size and application information ...
(Side note: We're improving on this! People have kindly shared individual patient dose data with me, so we'll do better for the final publication!)
#ESTRO2020

But altogether, we were able to estimate a dose response for local control (without surgery) as a function of tumour EQD2, using a weighted and bounded logistic regression. Our best estimate:
D50 = 71Gy
gamma50 = 1.1
#ESTRO2020 #radonc

One more important thing:
We know that smaller / early stage rectal cancers are more likely to respond to RT. There is an obvious risk that the observed dose-response relationship is purely due to cohorts with early cancers also receiving higher doses
#ESTRO2020 #radonc

So we controlled for this! We used a IPD meta analysis based measure of relative response probability, adjusted the data points accordingly, and allowed for different upper bounds for T1-2 and T3-4 cancers
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(10)70172-8/fulltext
#ESTRO2020 #radonc

Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal...

Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity...

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(10)70172-8/fulltext

Even when doing this, we still saw clear dose-response
- and we found different upper bounds for the maximum local control we can expect to achieve for early (~80%) and advanced (~65%) cancers.
D50 = 66Gy for T1-2 and 85Gy for T3-4
#ESTRO2020 #radonc

Does this provide definite evidence of a dose-response relationship? Obviously not. We still need randomized trials ... but that's why we are currently doing them!

APHRODITE https://ctru.leeds.ac.uk/aphrodite/
WW3 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04095299
OPERA https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02505750
#ESTRO2020 /END

Safety of a Boost (CXB or EBRT) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Early Rectal...

Safety of a Boost (CXB or EBRT) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma - Full Text View.

https://ctru.leeds.ac.uk/aphrodite/

You can follow @cancerphysicist.

Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: