“45 days” is referenced twice in EO 13848 along w who shall be made aware of findings at those target points. Looking at possible 90 day timeline?
Reread the EO:
Target Point 1) “Not later than 45 days from conclusion of election an assessment...”
Target Point 2) “Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General...” https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
Target Point 1) “Not later than 45 days from conclusion of election an assessment...”
Target Point 2) “Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General...” https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
FYI- EO 13848 also references the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
What is the significance of Bill Barr’s Nov 9 memo? Not a normal act by DOJ in an election.
“Post-Voting Election IRREGULARITY INQUIRIES”
The title & wording is precise with what needs to happen in order for DOJ & IC to do its job...at the right time.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/barr-memo-elections-fraud/9bf5cac375012c4c/full.pdf
“Post-Voting Election IRREGULARITY INQUIRIES”
The title & wording is precise with what needs to happen in order for DOJ & IC to do its job...at the right time.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/barr-memo-elections-fraud/9bf5cac375012c4c/full.pdf
Don’t forget- Richard Pilger, director of the elections crimes branch in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section resigned because of Bill Barr’s memo & unprecedented actions regarding an election.
I’m guessing Mr. Pilger wasn’t “in the know” on what was being staged.
I’m guessing Mr. Pilger wasn’t “in the know” on what was being staged.
The wording of EO and Barr’s memo sets the stage for the order of what is most likely going to happen.
“Post Election” so as not to give an appearance of interfering before election.
“Post Election” so as not to give an appearance of interfering before election.
Of course I’m speculating but Barr’s & Haspel’s visit to Mitch on November 9 (and Mitch’s subsequent senate floor announcement in support of Trump) leads me to believe things are happening.
Consider this. Are there wild claims from Powell/Giuliani/Ellis that would cause CNN/NYT to report anything they have uncovered...even if they call it a conspiracy?
Why yes. If it’s reported & questions arise, it probably should be investigated, right? https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/23/politics/sidney-powell-donald-trump/index.html
Why yes. If it’s reported & questions arise, it probably should be investigated, right? https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/23/politics/sidney-powell-donald-trump/index.html
Would there be any value in having the media report on any conspiracy of election fraud?
Yes. Both CNN and NYT took the bait. Couple their reporting with any evidence claimed by Giuliani et al. & I’m betting IC & DoJ will look into it- per Barr memo. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/giuliani-false-fraud-claims.html
Yes. Both CNN and NYT took the bait. Couple their reporting with any evidence claimed by Giuliani et al. & I’m betting IC & DoJ will look into it- per Barr memo. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/giuliani-false-fraud-claims.html