Stat Attack GW10

Thread 1:
Son or Kane?
Who to keep, who to sell?

I think if you own both Kane & Son then moving one of them on is perfectly fine. Having 2 premium assets from a team with a tricky fixture run & not providing a captaincy option is a bit much.

Spurs's attacking numbers since GW5 have dwindled and inspite the 2-0 win over City, there isn't enough in the stats to hold on to both

Spurs GW1-4 vs GW5-9 per game:

Shots: 15.75 vs 10.4
Shots in the Box: 11.5 vs 6.4
Shots on target: 7.75 vs 4.75
Big Chances: 4.25 vs 2.4

The dropoff in numbers is quite evident & inspite of the form, the fixtures definitely don't warrant a double up. So let's dive into their numbers & see who out of Kane & Son is worth holding on to:

Kane vs Son GW1-9:
Mins per Shots: 21.1 vs 36.6
Mins per Shot in the box: 32.1 vs 56.3
Mins per Shot on target: 53.6 vs 61
Mins per Big chance: 89.3 vs 73.2
Mins per Chance created: 42.3 vs 40.6
Mins per Big Chance created: 89.3 vs 244

Kane vs Son in all away games:
Mins per Shots: 17.7 vs 31
Mins per Shot in the box: 29.5 vs 34.2
Mins per Shot on target: 70.8 vs 42.7
Mins per Big chance: 88.5 vs 42.7
Mins per Chance created: 29.5 vs 42.7
Mins per Big Chance created: 70.8 vs 342

Based on the numbers, Kane is getting the more number of chances but Son is having more bigger chances inspite of penalties being in Kane's favour
Kane however is creating a lot of big chances & he completely blows Son away in this regard

Goals obviously lead to more points than assists & with Son being a midfielder & getting an additional point for a goal & CS each
Another factor going in favour of Son is that he has a much better goal threat than Kane in away games & Spurs have 3 out of their 4 away

With Kane & Son both unlikely to be captaincy candidates in the next few gameweeks, it makes much more sense to keep Son especially because he is also £1.5m more cheaper than Kane.
#FPLCommunity
#FPL