We've got #Covid19 policies backward in a lot of places:

Those least likely to get sick and die from the virus are most likely to be able to social distance & isolate.

Vermont is a place that did things differently. Check their daily case rate relative to other states. 1/
What's that mean?

They reflected in their policies what we've known from the start of the pandemic: some Americans are at a much higher risk of the virus -- people who work essential service jobs, live in old-age homes, shelters, prisons other congregate housing etc. 3/
Back to Vermont: Their package of #covid19 measures includes:
- state-supported housing for the homeless
- hazard pay, meal deliveries
- pop-up testing in at-risk communities
- they're also considering $1,000 stipends for people who’ve been asked to self-isolate
Vermont has done many other things right -- more details in the story and podcast 👇-- but these effort to support the highest-risk people to get tested, social distance and isolate certainly set them apart.

https://www.vox.com/2020/11/19/21541810/vermont-covid-19-coronavirus-social-distancing https://open.spotify.com/episode/3TDISfX5cgiFaFXXNQuCm2
The approach, though, isn't just about helping people in vulnerable communities, as @asosin says. It's also smart policy: it's about stopping transmission of the virus and saving lives.
I'm going to be thinking for a long time about something @sdbaral said.

"Never do a test without offering something in exchange." It's basic public health.

In #covid19, we haven't been doing that. We test, but we don't trace contacts, don't help people isolate.
You can follow @juliaoftoronto.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.