@BovairdSamantha's intro
🔶In 2018, @DSP_SPE launched a survey to assess students' perspective on federal funding

Survey focused on:
🔶Success Rates & award holder exp
🔶Application experience & criteria
🔶International ECR challenges & support
🔶EDI consideration
Survey Demographic
🔶SPE acknowledges that we should collect race-based data and include more gender identities in the future
Success Rate
What students value most
Recommended Scholarship value harmonization

Values should increase to recognize increased cost of living
Redefining success: add more value to

✅Project proposal
✅Research-related extracurricular activites
✅Societal impact
✅Periods of leave
The survey also identified the need for better

🔶International student support
🔶Support for women and non-binary researchers

*reminder that we did not provide sufficient gender identities in the survey at the time
Final recommendations

✅Harmonize value
✅Increase availability, value and eligibility period
✅Merit and eligibility criteria
✅Collect and report gender, race and LGBTQ2SIA+ rep data
@nabavinoushin's opening thoughts, representing @CAPSACSP

🟥Survey between Apr 1 to May 31
🟥Most participants are in BC and AB, roughly 400 participants
🟥COVID19 impacted 23% work permit application. PR App on hold; Work permit extension delayed, contract extension unclear
🟥40% did not have sufficient financial insurance
🟥88% did not apply for EI
🟥27%'s fellowships/contracts were negatively impacted
🟥17% of respondents had teaching responsibility; among them, 25% were negatively impacted by #COVID19
🟥83% had to cancel work-related travel plans
🟥research for 75% of respond were affected by covid
🟥37% affected job application
Positive experiences are attributed to
🟥employer being well organized in terms of virtual meetings and transitioning to remote work
🟥more time to read, analyze, write
🟥employer allowed to take office equipment home
Final recommendations

Check out CAPS' website for more resources, and keep an eye out for the full report coming up👀
🔵Demographic👇
🔵Research: COVID had negative impact on 76% of respondants
🔵Finances & Funding
🔵Health & wellness
🔵26% considered a leave of absence as opposed to 10% before the pandemic
Final thoughts & recommendations:

📌Mitigate research long-term impact
📌Increase funding
📌Prioritize #EDI
📌Invest in and improve mental health resources
📌Increase flexibility of long-term leave of absence

@DSP_SPE 's report on Mental Health …https://95323b55-8978-495d-94dd-ed077c2bade4.filesusr.com/ugd/7fd26f_e0aed9a40d7b4294b4dcf078e7e3db40.pdf
@suartce 's opening remarks from
🟪Impact of COVID on lab-based research trainees
🟪315 respondents + 18 semi-structured interviews
🟪Mixed method analysis
🟪Kubler-Ross Model of grief

Manuscript available now; will post link when I find it later in thread😅
Found the paper!

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-59050/v1

🟪In addition to emotions (in the figure in the last post) also looked at other concerns

A few quotes highlighted
🗨️decreased motivation to pursue/continue grad school
🗨️concerns of future funding for #science

Final recommendations
Now for the panel discussion👥

Who should be responsible to implement recommendations above?

NN: All of us! Grads & postdocs to push for change, institutional support is necessary. Must work & engae w/ diff stakeholders
FQ: stakholders have diff responsibilities. Work together!
CS: These findings aren't new; " #COVID19 exasperated cracks in the foundation". Long-lasting change requires academic cultural change
SB: small efforts have an impact: fill a survey, volunteer in grassroots groups. We are all NGOs - additional institutional support is crucial
This affects *all* academic institutions around the world. How can we learn from the larger international academic community?

FQ: Check out survey from Australia (1000 respondents at U of Sydney). Found that many considered leaving academia echoing findings from @TOSciPolicyNet
SB: There is additional info from South America & China. Totally agree that we should be mindful of local experiences to draw a representative picture of the whole impact of covid on researchers
@MitacsCanada has been successful in broadening the perspectives of grad students to transition to the workforce. How can academic institutions adopt similar programs?

FQ: Unis must assess needs in their local student community.
FQ: Federal funding agencies can better support "alternative career paths" like #scicomm. Rightfully pointed out though, the LARGE majority of grads don't continue in academia so is it really "alternative"🤔
SB: @DSP_SPE 's precisely calls to broaden the metrics for excellence; should de-silo expectation of grads to pursue academic career paths; specific support for international students is further required which has been prev highlighted by @IWS_Network https://twitter.com/AnhKhoiTrinh/status/1327304650907914241?s=20
Paul Dufour adds that provincial funding agencies should also be included in the mix💯

What are your final advices?

CS: Ask PIs (or their students) how they responded to #COVID19 ; really telling about the research culture of their labs
NN: #scientists role is more than collecting data, we should use it to create an impact in our local environment. Highlights funding programs like the AAAS fellowship

FQ: For MITACS, open it up for Master students
FQ: For more senior students, you have an important role to mentor & aid upcoming students (applying for grad school, summer research internships, etc.).

https://canadasrop.ca/ 

PD's thoughts: "don't be discourage" by our current lived-reality!
You can follow @AnhKhoiTrinh.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.