Few things that make me quite this annoyed-this thread by @millerjm86 tells you why, and includes a link to the said paper.

@WomeninPolarSci @WomenSciAUST @4womeninscience @GenderCC @womenalsoknow @STEM_Gender - is a statement needed against the paper mentioned? https://twitter.com/millerjm86/status/1328765642372042753
Here are the reviewer comments, that underline many of the problems in this paper (there are more!) but the issues do not seem to have been addressed in the publication. https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-020-19723-8/MediaObjects/41467_2020_19723_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
And since when is Mentorship = Co-authorship?

I feel like apologising to all the female mentees I have had over many many years, just in case I have dragged their careers down (as this paper seems to indicate).
And another great thread on the same publication in @NatureComms by @waterbarnes https://twitter.com/waterbarnes/status/1328933301038542850?s=20
You can follow @DrRenukaBadhe.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.