The judge was hostile & prejudicial,
— he used his authority in court while sitting a separate case to try to corner the lawyer regarding a political matter so that a slew of headlines, intentionally trading in gross contextomy, might be written to denigrate the President

I may go thru the motions of digging thru more of them but if there is any lesson I am drawing from this, it is to IGNORE HEADLINES REGARDING ELECTION LAWSUITS, at least for now, unless you are prepared to invest a significant amount of research into the filings & transcripts...

This was my stance even before I started digging into this because I knew any case of consequence would be appealed & that lower court rulings might not ultimately matter

But now I am all the more convinced it is an exercise in futility...