We can’t have elections where we must rely on one man or woman to tell us whether our elections are secure. This is an absurd & unworkable model. What if Krebs’s replacement is corrupt or inept or some voters don’t trust him or her? We need evidence-based elections. Period. 1/ https://twitter.com/jennycohn1/status/1103819435507236864

The Democrats tried with the #SAFEAct, which wld have banned internet connectivity and required robust manual audits to confirm electronic results, but not a single Republican supported it. Not one. 2/

3/ https://www.axios.com/gop-senator-election-security-blocks-3f432161-42f4-4fa2-9207-d281ec857058.html

4/ We must not fool ourselves that Krebs or his future replacements are an appropriate substitute for evidence-based elections. If we want people to trust election outcomes, we must provide evidence. Someone’s word isn’t evidence.