Keep an eye out for information from the Lin Wood filed case in Georgia. There are some astonishing affidavits being filed under penalty of perjury. I'm going to CAUTIONSLY give SOS Raffensperger a bit of credit here. I think he knew he needed to keep the recount neutral.
It could not be seen as a partisan effort by the Georgia GOP on behalf of the Trump campaign. But he also knew that if there were vote irregularities in some of the counties, a hand recount of the ballots would reveal some of that. Now you have affidavits being filed ...
referencing stacks of "pristine" mail-in ballots -- no signs of having been creased by being in an envelope, or having been previously handled -- being pulled out of boxes and being counted. You have "overlooked" electronic memory devices that were not previously tallied.
You have auditors and observers describing perfectly filled in bubbles on mail-in ballots -- which should have been done by the voters by hand -- and stacks of mail in ballots that have a vote only for the Presidential race and nothing else.
If there was fraud on election night, the officials involved in that would have needed to try to cover their tracks in a hand recount, and this is the only kind of thing they could have done--create enough ballots to get the numbers close to what they reported on election night.
And we haven't even started yet on the issue of the failure to do signature matching as required.
This litigation is how the case in Penn. should be going.
This litigation is how the case in Penn. should be going.