(2) The danger here isn't so much confusion about what moral teaching _is_ but confusion about how binding the church's authority to teach is.

(3) That confusion has several (other) important sources, beyond the incoherence of a personally-opposed-but… attitude toward abortion.
Among those other important sources:

(a) The perception that in the church's practical opposition to abortion, partisan politics has become more important than morality. (The last few months of "no good Catholic can vote Democrat …" nonsense have made this much, much worse.)
(b) The erosion of the church's moral authority (and the moral voice of the conference of bishops especially) because of the sex abuse crisis and lay Catholics' frustration with the episcopacy's response, which they judge as anemic, self-protective, and morally unserious.
So this working group on how to deal with a Catholic president should also think about how confusion on the church's authority to teach is exacerbated by the attempt among some to dictate Catholics' political choices in partisan terms and practical failures to respond to abuse.
You can follow @SSawyerSJ.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.