Today @NAOorguk report on procurement during COVID-19: contracts worth £18 bn had been awarded by July, of which £10.5 bn was awarded without competition.

Direct awards might be necessary in situations of "extreme urgency" - but this is no excuse to skimp on transparency... /1
Transparency in procurement helps to ensure accountability, and that taxpayers' money is being spent carefully.

Without competition, the risk of unfair/poor value procurement is raised - so a proper record of decision-making is even more important.

/2
To ensure that taxpayers' money is spent wisely, Government needs a record of:

⚠️ Why was a direct appointment necessary?
⚠️ Why was a supplier chosen?
⚠️ How were risks mitigated?

Contract details need to be published in a timely way to allow for public scrutiny.

/3
It's concerning that @NAOorguk found gaps in some of this reporting.

Incomplete records justifying procurement decisions and delays reporting contracts creates space for speculation and accusations of cronyism - which damages public trust. 👎

/4
Government needs to be a better customer for the rest of this pandemic and beyond - we've been critical of poor transparency before. 🙄

We laid out arguments and recommendations for better transparency in Please Procure Responsibly (2019). 💰

⚠️ https://reform.uk/research/please-procure-responsibly-state-public-service-commissioning ⚠️

5/5
You can follow @reformthinktank.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.