The dissident right was aware of the dangers of c0ronav1rus back in january, and its fascinating to track how the v1rus has shifted in politicization since. When we were the only ppl really aware of this it was accordingly weaponized in a manner that aligned with our vision.

This was typified in how one of the aspects of our solution was to shut down immigration. But skip to november and there's no denying that the bolognavirus is a lefty cultural weapon.

Now the v1rus is primarily being used to attack the freedoms of native citizens in a globoh0mo-approved manner: the current paradigm can be summed up as "no thanksgiving for u but its NBD if u attend a Bantu Lives Matter event."

No disaster goes to waste, both sides needed to weaponize this happening and there's clearly been a winner. This leads to interesting conclusions.

1) The dissident RW is a generative force, we got to this happening first & initially the LW was reacting to our proposed solutions

2) It is evidence of the left's cultural hegemony that they ended up owning the virus, and tailoring its cultural impact in the service of their own goals.

3) The LW's goals as typified by their responses to the virus once it became "their happening" (EG the gained control of it as a cultural event) are a reminder of their faction's status as the dominant power of the age.

Dominant powers, broadly speaking, want to restrict citizen freedoms in order to calcify the current order- they want things to slow down so that things can continue as is. They also want to consolidate power and influence to make the current order ez to maintain.

What's really interesting is that accordingly the dissident right must be a dissolving force, it needs to loosen up the current system. This is interesting because that's not typically what a "conservative" movement wants, or for that matter, what they are good at.

And that's why the dissident RW tends to butt heads with the G0PE, at the end of the day we treasure conservative values (the importance of family and tradition for ex), but we can't be a conservative movement- we need to be generative and acidic to the current order.

Now its likely that "conservative" being understood as stodgy status quo preservation is a trope by mandate of the current powers that be, but its important to remember that either way that stereotype typifies something that doesn't get jack done in our current paradigm.

This leaves us dissidents w/ 2 non-mutually-exclusive paths of attack:

1) Be the generative dissolving agent attacking the current status quo.

2) Be powerful and in position to take the reigns when this system burns itself out (possibly aided by the dissolving force of group 1)