Read on Twitter
We always talk about morality easily, when it's such a complex issue in fact. I've been reading some theories about it. Although, I have to admit that I had no interest in deepening into it.
However, I've been focusing on VA again, because there are characters whose headcanons I want to write and have already written, but I don't think I will make them public at the moment and my point is that I felt so stupid.
We're used to the idea of ​​having heroes and villains, that even unconsciously we snatch the humanity they possess or should it.
I always say that there is just shit that we cannot accept or justify, but sympathizing is different. At the end, whatever is up to our judgment.
I always say that there is just shit that we cannot accept or justify, but sympathizing is different. At the end, whatever is up to our judgment.
I felt stupid for not considering other aspects regarding Diavolo or the fact that we don't really have a hero in this part and don't get me wrong, this is not an attack on our protagonist, because actually he is one of my favorites.
They all had the same goal, y'all know who I'm talking about, but different motivations. However, they were all undoubtedly part of the same circle. Mafia comprises lots of criminal organizations, clearly, it does not represent something morally correct.
But, morality goes into simpler points, at least for me, lol. For example: since they were all part of that thread, to reach their goals they did things that we would punish, right? Diavolo wanted to murder his daughter and keep himself in the shadows.
Murder a person, which in many legal systems of different countries is aggravated when it comes to family. But, the others, did the same to get to him; deaths There is not much difference. I'm explaining myself like shit, I didn't prepare this, but I wanted to get it out of me.
Of course, I'm not only talking about our mains. My personal conception of the human being is to see us as a scale, all finally on the same path full of "mistakes" neither evil nor good, both complemented each other.
But it's complicated. Because, what mistakes or improper acts are always depend on ourselves. But, without a doubt, a murder and a rape deserve punishments, because they attack principles that we have as a human being and principles and morals go together.
But why is adultery punished in some countries and not in others? It's still a bad thing, right?
At this point, I think too much about that distinction. But, I don't reject it, it's an idea that I agree with and I know everyone, lol.
At this point, I think too much about that distinction. But, I don't reject it, it's an idea that I agree with and I know everyone, lol.
There is also a well-known phrase which is "The end justifies the means", some people say it comes from an interpretation of "The prince" book by Nicolás Machiavelli, that I really recommend, I read it for constitutional law. I'm not sure where it comes from. So, I apologize.
It means that when the end goal is important, any means to achieve it, is valid. A phrase that I see in part five and of course, not only there. But, I'm only talking about this one.
Says a lot in a few words and that has undoubtedly been the support of both correct and incorrect actions, but more the last ones. I've also read about Kantian ethics, but at this time I can't offer a position. However, I think it is tied to this phrase or what it means in a way.
I don't want to write anymore, but if you got here I apologize for having weak ideas and not being more detailed. Like I said, I just wanted to get it out. In conclusion, morality is complicated and we are curious.
