THREAD: as always with any @iaeaorg meeting and report, always helps to listen to @rafaelmgrossi 's press conference .
So on the news of #iran injecting UF6 to 176 IR-2m DG spoke of a "nuance"

DG: cascade moved from pilot fuel enrich. plant 2 fuel enrichment plant, so that had already happened... what it means?it is beyond limitations of JCPOA but in general terms no significant increase in volumes,since as I mentioned they had been operating in a different place,

On amount of enriched U : pace is more or else regular , there was slight decrease at some points,that is also because they are moving things and with connecting & disconnecting there is an interruption...

more on amount of Enriched U: in general terms I think the volume is increasing steadily. this 174 was operating before, and you can’t say there would be a jump all of a sudden, that being said they continue to enrich more and more.

on Torquzabad: latest info we got was not technically credible, this is why we are now saying but we believe they need to give us information which is credible . what they have been telling us from a technical POV doesn’t add up. They need to clarify.

On why no more 2nd report : The other reports were motivated by the impossibility of access…following the understanding reached in Tehran access was granted. So there was no need for me to issue a report on that particular matter/

without mentioning Torquzabad , DG adds: This (torquzabad) is a separate issue, I hope we’ll be able to clarify it. Words we choose in my report have a meaning, what we want to convey to Iran is they have to give full technically satisfactory explanation

Abt plan 2build underground @ Natanz & need for visit : the stage they R at isnt required by AP, they can do that at a later stage...we're of course following events there ...on capacity,info will come when they show us design, hasn’t happened yet,but nothing abnormal about that