How does the ‘tale of two Indias’ look like when examining intergenerational mobility? What’s the fate of Professionals’ sons? Do Laborers’ sons experience upward mobility?

The main pattern is social reproduction,
as this graph inspired by @Daniel_Laurison et al. (2020) shows
This is obvious looking at the flows from one class to another: the thickest one is always remaining in the same class. Hence, in terms of class structure, while Farmers and laborers represented 72% of the fathers’ labor force, they are still almost 60% of sons!
How do the class structure and mobility patterns differ from one social group to another? Here, I focus on Brahmins (Hindu upper castes), Dalit (Hindu low castes) and Muslims, the largest religious minority in India (14% of the population)


...
A few observations: 1/ Class structure is very different between these 3 groups: 1/2 of Brahmins belong to the prof/clerical class but only 14% of Dalits do. Muslims are in-between with 28%. While 1/2 of Dalits are laborers, less than 10% of Brahmins and 28% of Muslims are
2/ In each stratum, the biggest intergenerational flow is the one of reproduction (flows go from one Origin class into the same Destination class). Look at the prof/clerical class flow among Brahmins and the laborers flow among Dalits!
3/ Structural diffces are so strong that they tend to mask mobility patterns. Thanks to @FlavienGanter’s suggestion, I changes the labels: numbers on the right of each stratum now represent the proportion in each flow relative to the size of Origin or Destination class
Eg 73% of Brahmin fathers in Prof/Clerical positions also have their son in the same cat, respectively 51% of Dalit fathers and 61 of Muslim fathers… And ½ of Brahmin sons in prof/clerical positions had their fathers in the same position, 26% of Dalit sons and 38% of Muslim sons
4/ So upper class reproduction is highest for Brahmins, lowest for Dalits, and Muslims stand again in-between. Inversely, lower class reproduction is the highest for Dalits, lowest for Brahmins and Muslims are in-between.
5/ One can then read that trajectories of extreme downward mobility (prof/clerical workers to laborers) are more common among Dalits and Muslims than among Brahmins. Inversely, trajectories of extreme upward mobility (laborers to higher class) are more common among Brahmins.
6/ What’s the fate of Farmers? When Farmers’ sons do not become farmers (most common pattern!), they tend to become prof/clerical workers among Brahmins while among Dalits and Muslims they rather tend to become laborers: agrarian conversion is more successful for upper castes…
Mobility studies in India have been rare even though sociologists like D. Vaid, @ssjodhka or @JulesNaudet have been extremely important to focus our attention on this topic in the past years. Caste is to a certain extent an occupational class, the caste-class congruence is high…
(and I collapsed professional and clerical categories together, along with Higher and Lower vocational categories to ease the reading. Laborers correspond both to agricultural workers and construction workers, which often switch occupations: “multi-activity”).
Thanks for reading, end of the thread!
You can follow @mathieu_kf.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.