Read on Twitter
This chomu doesn't have courage even to talk to the general public by deactivating comment section.
&trying to start a "debate" with @TIinExile after blocking him
BTW 3 periods of Harappan published at Rakhigarhi with following radiocarbon dating
6420±110 years before present https://twitter.com/devduttmyth/status/1328548477240897536
&trying to start a "debate" with @TIinExile after blocking him
BTW 3 periods of Harappan published at Rakhigarhi with following radiocarbon dating
6420±110 years before present https://twitter.com/devduttmyth/status/1328548477240897536
Case 2 - In this article, Devdutt Myth says that Prakrit came earlier than Sanskrit.
I would have laughed at his ignorance, his utter lack of basic linguistic knowledge, and moved on, but this misconception seems to be very widespread.
I would have laughed at his ignorance, his utter lack of basic linguistic knowledge, and moved on, but this misconception seems to be very widespread.
Case 3
The Adikavi of Telugu was Nannayya, a Brahmin The "Adikavi" of Kannada was Pampa, a Brahmin.
The "Adikavi" of Gujarati was Narsinh Mehta, a Brahmin It was a Brahmin reformist who first brought Dalits into temples.
Trust this "Myth" guy to turn everything to Brahmin hate
The Adikavi of Telugu was Nannayya, a Brahmin The "Adikavi" of Kannada was Pampa, a Brahmin.
The "Adikavi" of Gujarati was Narsinh Mehta, a Brahmin It was a Brahmin reformist who first brought Dalits into temples.
Trust this "Myth" guy to turn everything to Brahmin hate
Case 4
@TIinExile
The correct phonetic sound of "BherunDa"(भेरुण्ड/ಭೇರುಂಡ) is labio-velar voiced aspirate bhe(भे/ಭೇ) & NOT voiced labio-velar be(बे/ಬೇ)
2."be" does not mean "two" either in Kannada / Sanskrit. भेरुण्ड/ಭೇರುಂಡ means 'terrible'
3.The biggest myth is your scholarship
@TIinExile
The correct phonetic sound of "BherunDa"(भेरुण्ड/ಭೇರುಂಡ) is labio-velar voiced aspirate bhe(भे/ಭೇ) & NOT voiced labio-velar be(बे/ಬೇ)
2."be" does not mean "two" either in Kannada / Sanskrit. भेरुण्ड/ಭೇರುಂಡ means 'terrible'
3.The biggest myth is your scholarship
Case 5
If Yudhiṣṭhira was just "character of an Epic created 2000 years ago"
how did Pāṇini mention Yudhiṣṭhira in Aṣṭādhyāyī (8.3.95) dating back to atleast 2400 years?
How did Sātavāhanas mention him in inscriptions dating back to 2100 years?
Dropped ur brain somewhere?
If Yudhiṣṭhira was just "character of an Epic created 2000 years ago"
how did Pāṇini mention Yudhiṣṭhira in Aṣṭādhyāyī (8.3.95) dating back to atleast 2400 years?
How did Sātavāhanas mention him in inscriptions dating back to 2100 years?
Dropped ur brain somewhere?
In Aṣṭādhyāyī (8.3.95),Panini explains गवियुधिभ्यां स्थिरः Sutra.
Basically,he says that the sibilant *s preceded by front vowel * I becomes the palatal retroflex *ṣ.
As an example,he cites the name of Yudhiṣṭhira. What Pāṇini explained is what today's linguists call "Ruki"
Basically,he says that the sibilant *s preceded by front vowel * I becomes the palatal retroflex *ṣ.
As an example,he cites the name of Yudhiṣṭhira. What Pāṇini explained is what today's linguists call "Ruki"
If Yudhiṣṭhira was a "2000-year-old fictional character" inspired by King Ashoka as Romila Thapar's and Devdutts of this world claim, how did Chanakya (c.320 BC), the minister of Ashoka's grandfather, mention Yudhiṣṭhira in his Arthaśāstra?
I dare you to answer @devduttmyth
I dare you to answer @devduttmyth
@devduttmyth In Chapter 8 of Arthaśāstra, Kautilya compares hunting to gambling. Kautilya says gambling is a bigger vice than hunting and recounts "the history of Yudhiṣṭhira" who lost everything in gambling From Arthashastra 8.1 (English translation by Shamsastry).
Buddha praised King Yudhiṣṭhira as " wise, righteous, greatest alms-giver". Recorded in ancient Buddhist scriptures. Ashoka was a Buddhist king who tried to rule like great kings praised by Buddha. So, who inspired whom? Is it so hard for this "Eminent historian" to figure out?
Buddha praises Yudhiṣṭhira as "the righteous king who formerly ruled Indraprastha & set entire Bhāratavarsha in commotion with alms-giving" (Dhūmakāri-jātaka, Dasabrahmana Jataka).
Ashoka ruled 200 years after Buddha.
But this genius says Ashoka was born before Yudhiṣṭhira
Ashoka ruled 200 years after Buddha.
But this genius says Ashoka was born before Yudhiṣṭhira
Case 6
@TIinExile : Even the word "Urdu' is a foreign Turkish word meaning "military camp"Urdu was born in invader camps.
Until 1800,there was no such thing as "Urdu language"
The language was simply called Hindi.
In 1800,poet Mashafi was the first one to call this language"Urdu"
@TIinExile : Even the word "Urdu' is a foreign Turkish word meaning "military camp"Urdu was born in invader camps.
Until 1800,there was no such thing as "Urdu language"
The language was simply called Hindi.
In 1800,poet Mashafi was the first one to call this language"Urdu"
Case 7
Hey Mythologist, Please spare us at least on Dussehra.
Go back and learn your basics.
Ravana is 20 handed,not 10 handed.
He is described as विंशत् भुजम् = 20 handed in Ramayana
विंशत् भुजम् दश ग्रीवम् दर्शनीय परिच्छदम् |
विशाल वक्षसम् वीरम् राज लक्ष्मण लक्षितम् ||-3.32.9
Hey Mythologist, Please spare us at least on Dussehra.
Go back and learn your basics.
Ravana is 20 handed,not 10 handed.
He is described as विंशत् भुजम् = 20 handed in Ramayana
विंशत् भुजम् दश ग्रीवम् दर्शनीय परिच्छदम् |
विशाल वक्षसम् वीरम् राज लक्ष्मण लक्षितम् ||-3.32.9
Case 8
Rajputs never practiced ambush?
Ever heard of Durgadas Rathore?
He was Aurangzeb's most wanted.
For 28 years,Aurangzeb searched for him without any success.
Because Durgadas was an expert of ambush & guerrilla After Aurangzeb died,he kicked Mughals out & liberated Marwar.
Rajputs never practiced ambush?
Ever heard of Durgadas Rathore?
He was Aurangzeb's most wanted.
For 28 years,Aurangzeb searched for him without any success.
Because Durgadas was an expert of ambush & guerrilla After Aurangzeb died,he kicked Mughals out & liberated Marwar.
@TIinExile : What they keep telling you: Jain Marwadis financed East India Company
What they DO NOT tell you: Jain Marwadis also financed Marathas & Sadhus At one point,they were desperately trying to finance anyone who could get rid of their Nawab, Jihadi rapist Siraj-ud-daulah
What they DO NOT tell you: Jain Marwadis also financed Marathas & Sadhus At one point,they were desperately trying to finance anyone who could get rid of their Nawab, Jihadi rapist Siraj-ud-daulah
@TIinExile
Wrong! Panini never said anything like that.
It was Patanjali who said
"when you need pots,you go to a potter but when you need words,you don't go to a grammarian. You go to the people who speak the language"
He also nowhere said "market"
Go back & read up your basics
Wrong! Panini never said anything like that.
It was Patanjali who said
"when you need pots,you go to a potter but when you need words,you don't go to a grammarian. You go to the people who speak the language"
He also nowhere said "market"
Go back & read up your basics
Case 10
@TIinExile
India's "first empire" was NOT exclusively Buddhist.
Chandragupta Maurya patronised Vedic Hinduism & Jainism.
Bindusara patronised Vedic Hinduism Ashoka was Buddhist.
His descendant Samprati again favoured Hinduism.
Stop writing nonsense &read-only primary src
@TIinExile
India's "first empire" was NOT exclusively Buddhist.
Chandragupta Maurya patronised Vedic Hinduism & Jainism.
Bindusara patronised Vedic Hinduism Ashoka was Buddhist.
His descendant Samprati again favoured Hinduism.
Stop writing nonsense &read-only primary src
+
You are factually wrong.
Mauryans DID NOT "value Pali".
In fact, there was not a single inscription issued by Mauryans in canonical Pali.
In Eastern India, they used Ardha-Magadhi.
In Western India, they used a language closer to Pali In North West, they used Gandhari.
You are factually wrong.
Mauryans DID NOT "value Pali".
In fact, there was not a single inscription issued by Mauryans in canonical Pali.
In Eastern India, they used Ardha-Magadhi.
In Western India, they used a language closer to Pali In North West, they used Gandhari.
Case 11
@TIinExile : Sanskrit manuscripts dating back to 6th century CE & written on paper were discovered in Gilgit (Jammu & Kashmir) in 1931.
Some of these manuscripts are still housed in Srinagar Museum. These manuscripts were written on paper even before your Islam was born.
@TIinExile : Sanskrit manuscripts dating back to 6th century CE & written on paper were discovered in Gilgit (Jammu & Kashmir) in 1931.
Some of these manuscripts are still housed in Srinagar Museum. These manuscripts were written on paper even before your Islam was born.
+
Here is a manuscript from the Gilgit collection.
Written with ink on paper recording Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sutra.
The language is Sanskrit & the script is (Proto) Sharada. Dates back to the 6th century CE +
Here is a manuscript from the Gilgit collection.
Written with ink on paper recording Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sutra.
The language is Sanskrit & the script is (Proto) Sharada. Dates back to the 6th century CE +
The documents have been dated to the beginning of the 6thCE
Ancient paper manuscripts were found in remote arid Gilgit but not in a cultural center like Varanasi.
All thanks to the climate!
Testimony of foreign travelers like Yijing(7th CE) confirms the widespread use of paper.
Ancient paper manuscripts were found in remote arid Gilgit but not in a cultural center like Varanasi.
All thanks to the climate!
Testimony of foreign travelers like Yijing(7th CE) confirms the widespread use of paper.
Case 12
Fool!You are wrong again!
There is the presence of a veil even in the earliest Indian temple art.
This is an image of a Yakshi excavated from an ancient temple site in Gandhara(2nd CE)
One can clearly see her veil.
This was 500 years before Islamic religion was even born.
Fool!You are wrong again!
There is the presence of a veil even in the earliest Indian temple art.
This is an image of a Yakshi excavated from an ancient temple site in Gandhara(2nd CE)
One can clearly see her veil.
This was 500 years before Islamic religion was even born.
And here is another depiction of a Yakshi (folk goddess) from Bharhut, Madhya Pradesh (2nd century BCE).
One can very clearly see her head covering.
This was depicted 800 years before Islam I could go on and on.
The fact is that veils are very prominent in Indian temple art. +
One can very clearly see her head covering.
This was depicted 800 years before Islam I could go on and on.
The fact is that veils are very prominent in Indian temple art. +
@TIinExile : Nobody is talking about "covering face".
Devdutt Myth claimed and I quote
"in no temple art is a woman shown covering her head".
I just gave a few examples which prove his statement WRONG.
Devdutt Myth claimed and I quote
"in no temple art is a woman shown covering her head".
I just gave a few examples which prove his statement WRONG.
case 13
It was Gandhi himself who described Savarkar as Veer (brave)
This is what Gandhi said :
"I met Savarkar in London. He is brave, clever, patriot, revolutionary.
Saw evil of the British Govt much earlier than I did
He is in Andaman (jail) for having loved India"
It was Gandhi himself who described Savarkar as Veer (brave)
This is what Gandhi said :
"I met Savarkar in London. He is brave, clever, patriot, revolutionary.
Saw evil of the British Govt much earlier than I did
He is in Andaman (jail) for having loved India"
@TIinExile :
While Congress and liberals incessantly malign Veer Savarkar, this is what their father Gandhi had to say.
When you really have no idea, you must STOP writing nonsense & maligning national heroes!
While Congress and liberals incessantly malign Veer Savarkar, this is what their father Gandhi had to say.
When you really have no idea, you must STOP writing nonsense & maligning national heroes!
Case 14
You are WRONG again!
NO Vedic text (whether Samhita, Brahmana, Aranyaka or Upanishad) talks about Matsyanyaya.
It is elaborated upon in Arthashastra & alluded to in Shantiparva of Mahabharata.
But I don't expect a fraud mythologist like you to know anything about Vedas
You are WRONG again!
NO Vedic text (whether Samhita, Brahmana, Aranyaka or Upanishad) talks about Matsyanyaya.
It is elaborated upon in Arthashastra & alluded to in Shantiparva of Mahabharata.
But I don't expect a fraud mythologist like you to know anything about Vedas
Case 15
You are WRONG as always!
There is NO Rgveda manuscript that dates back to Gupta times!
The one from the Bhandarkar library that you are citing in your screenshot (5/1875-76) is a Sharada manuscript that dates back to only 15th century CE!
It was used by Max Mueller!
You are WRONG as always!
There is NO Rgveda manuscript that dates back to Gupta times!
The one from the Bhandarkar library that you are citing in your screenshot (5/1875-76) is a Sharada manuscript that dates back to only 15th century CE!
It was used by Max Mueller!
@TIinExile :
Punjabi and Odia are indeed from the same Indic language family but Hurrian has got nothing to do with the Indic language family!
It is funny to see these illiterates, who think Hurrian is Indic, teach me linguistics.
Punjabi and Odia are indeed from the same Indic language family but Hurrian has got nothing to do with the Indic language family!
It is funny to see these illiterates, who think Hurrian is Indic, teach me linguistics.
@TIinExile :
Does this tongue have any Adhikara to speak about Dharma and Shastras?
I feel sorry for everyone who considers him an expert on Hindu scriptures.
I feel sorry for those who have to learn Hinduism from the mouth of this (you know
already!) - True Indology
Does this tongue have any Adhikara to speak about Dharma and Shastras?
I feel sorry for everyone who considers him an expert on Hindu scriptures.
I feel sorry for those who have to learn Hinduism from the mouth of this (you know
already!) - True Indology
