Not before time, the UN shipping body allows media to cover national negotiating positions https://twitter.com/Anastassios_LL/status/1328288085143072769
*Finley
It seems the absurdity of it galvanised some transparency campaigners and delegates into getting the rules changed - thanks folks!
Countries that present themselves as climate leaders in other settings - Norway, France, Japan - are backing a weak compromise, with no enforcement of fuel efficiency measures until 2030
We're talking about a sector responsible for ~3% of global GHG emissions and plenty of technical options to clean up its impacts
There are other avenues for climate action in shipping: port regulations, industry forums, regional carbon pricing etc. But only the IMO can implement global regulations
Because ships can register their flags anywhere, there is a race to the bottom when it comes to regulatory requirements. Several countries are represented by flag registry officials, who do not necessarily reflect the national interest
The starkest example is the Marshall Islands, which faces an existential threat from rising sea levels. It is also, nominally, the world's second largest flag registry. In actual fact the flag registry operates from Virginia, US
Media scrutiny is essential for citizens of these countries to hold their governments accountable for positions supposedly taken on their behalf
We all have a stake in the outcome of these talks. Thanks to @IMOHQ for recognising that and improving transparency /end thread
You can follow @climatemegan.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.