1/ Let's clear up some misunderstandings about the "5%er" narrative

Did Trump lose support among White men? Yes

Did this "cost him the election"? No, and in order to believe this, you would have to fail to understand both the nature and the scope of the fraud operation

2/ The idea that this drop in support "cost him the election" presupposes that there was a constant number of fraudulent ballots, C, such that although the number of Trump votes T was greater than the number of Biden votes B (i.e., T > B), T < B+ C

3/ But that isn't how these kinds of operations work

Listen to Powell here: "it's the software that's the problem"

WHAT SMARTMATIC SOFTWARE DOES is give you real-time information about how many ballots you need to overturn a given margin https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1327999228879237123

4/ Meaning the C term here (wish I had chosen F but whatever) is not constant, but variable

in other words, C is a function of the *instantaneous difference* between T and B at a given moment in time, rather than whatever the projected final totals are at the end of the process

5/ Hence, the only constraint or upper bound on C is the number of *PHYSICALLY VALID BALLOTS* that could theoretically be filled out, P

note however that P > the number of registered voters R; recall stories all summer about double-mailings, "printer errors," etc

6/ In other words, the Democrats had at their disposal more than enough *PHYSICALLY VALID BALLOTS* to overcome millions more White men showing up to vote for Trump

Would that have made the fraud more obvious?

Not substantially more than it already is, no.