Isn't it interesting how "Romans 13," "law and order," "submitting to authorities," and the need for "peaceful protests" suddenly disappear from the rhetoric once things aren't going the way diehard Trump supporters want them to?

It's also interesting how the "don't gloat after the vote" and "don't put your trust in princes" Evangelical rhetoric hasn't been applied to diehard Evangelical supporters of Trump who are claiming that, contrary reality and facts, that he actually won the election.

It's also interesting how evangelical concerns about "dangerous worldviews infiltrating the church" are not being addressed in the low hanging fruit of Evangelicals flocking to Parler, conspiracy theories, and outright lies and untruths about the world and the way things work.

Further, I think it's very clear now that the rhetoric of "unity after the results of the election" is thoroughly insufficient for dealing with the fact that people in evangelical pews are completely beholden to making sure that no common ground in epistemology is even possible.

There is no "agree to disagree" in situations where people can't even agree on what is a fact and how to assess the truth at a basic level.

CRT is a "threat to the church?" Nah, how about straight up epistemological relativism that is clear postmodernism on steroids?