1) The challenge is not to show there was fraud. Anyone with a brain knows this.

2) The challenge is to prove it in such a way in our electoral process that one of two things happen: either a judge removes ballots gained illegally from Biteme's total, or

2) contd . . . a state legislature is so convinced that the overwhelming fraud resulted in an election so deeply flawed it would have had a different outcome beyond a reasonable doubt.

3) The first is incredibly difficult. Judges do not take votes off the board.

4) Recounts can. But usually not many. In Bush v. Gore the recount process actually ADDED to Bush's total. Other recounts have had similar results.

Worse, a recount only recounts fraud.

5) So now you're down to hoping to convince a judge to stipulate a strict series of remedies, including a re-canvassing, a hand-recount, and throwing out specific types of ballots (no signatures, for ex).

Sorry, I just don't see this happening.

6) What I'm saying is that while there may be a very clear strategy by Trump's team, I'm not seeing how they plan to remove about 300,000 votes from Biteme's total.

7) The PA case will not do that. It may take 10,000.