I'd like to talk about understanding God, and how there will, necessarily, always be a limit to what we may understand. So let's talk about ants, cars, and God for a second:

An ant and a human being both exist in the same physical plane. An ant, however, will never be able to understand the concept of driving a car. The ant will never know the difference between an SUV and a sports car...

... and this gap between the ant and human is seen as so vast that whatever actions a human may choose could never be understood or fathomed by the ant.

The ant cannot create a car. The ant does not write car reviews, does not make videos for you to like and subscribe to.

But what can a human being create by itself? Another human? Even then, a human must have another person in order to do that.

So this human attempts to rationalize God...

If God exists (which I believe He does) it would mean that God is The Creator of space, time, gravity… God is The Source of existence, of life and of death, of beginning and end, The Sustainer of all that exists and will exist.

Therefore, if an ant cannot fathom the choices and perceptions of a mere human, what is the chance that we may fathom the choices of God?

In my opinion, this must be the foundation of any discussion of God, that there will always--logically--be a limitation to what we may understand and rationalize.