Read on Twitter
This is Lin Wood's lawsuit as a Presidential tweet.
Here's the thing, the consent decree required 2 people to find a signature mismatch and to provide a chance to cure. That is not "impossible." And the decree was in March.
You waited until 8 months later to bring it up? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327619653020110850
Here's the thing, the consent decree required 2 people to find a signature mismatch and to provide a chance to cure. That is not "impossible." And the decree was in March.
You waited until 8 months later to bring it up? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327619653020110850
Here' the text of the order, pulled from Wood's lawsuit.
Notably, the signature requirement from the statute is still in effect. It is just that the Secretary of State agreed to a method of determining whether a signature matches, in this case, comparing against other records and requiring three people to check.
Also, this new procedure came about after a Federal District Court issued an injunction to the SoS. The SoS asked for a stay and got rejected, because the 11th Circuit said it violated Due Process to cancel people's votes for something so arbitrary.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17313616285600621349&q=Georgia+muslim+voters+kemp+pryor&hl=en&as_sdt=80003
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17313616285600621349&q=Georgia+muslim+voters+kemp+pryor&hl=en&as_sdt=80003
So, in all fairness to the SoS, he fought as hard as he could not to implement these procedures, but he lost his appeal and a federal court required this signature matching system under the FEDERAL constitution.
Which probably kills the constitutional argument.
Which probably kills the constitutional argument.
