Listen carefully to Sydney Powell's "release the Kraken" interview. She mentions several times the effect of this information on state legislatures. Someone at her level of forensic skills chooses each word cautiously. Wy refer to state legislatures? See my analysis
This election
will not be decided by fraudulent mail in ballots. State legislatures must follow the directives of SCOTUS. Here are the rules. SCOTUS will reject mail in ballots because 2 U.S.C. § 7 (“The Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year, is
established as the day for the election, in each of the States. Therefore, no state may extend voting beyond said one day period. Bush v. Gore 531 U.S. 98, 103 (2000): “In certifying election results, the votes eligible for inclusion in the certification are the votes meeting
the properly established legal requirements.” In Bush v. Gore, at 104, SCOTUS wrote: The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election
as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the electoral college. U. S. Const., Art. II, § 1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1, 35 (1892), that the state legislature's power to select the manner for appointing electors is
plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by state legislatures in several States for many years after the framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28-33. Moreover, at 104-5, SCOTUS wrote: The right to vote is protected in more
than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person's vote over that of another. See,
e. g., Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U. S. 663, 665 (1966) ("[O]nce the franchise is granted to the electorate, lines may not be drawn which are inconsistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"). It must be remembered that "the right of
suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen's vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise." Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 555 (1964). “The question before us, however, is whether the recount procedures
the Florida Supreme Court has adopted are consistent with its obligation to avoid arbitrary and disparate treatment of the members of its electorate.” Id., at 105. “The recount mechanisms implemented in response to the decisions of the Florida Supreme Court do not satisfy the
minimum requirement for nonarbitrary treatment of voters necessary to secure the fundamental right.”. Id. In summary, state legislatures must pick the electors if the state’s secretary of state fails to comply with the rules as enunciated by SCOTUS
You can follow @donaldrusso994.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.