e.g. in @shanah29 and co, 'Brad' re: using PrEP:
“I had never known that level of non-anxiety. You always go to bed with anxiety, right? You want to be with somebody, it’s like, it’s the third partner who’s always there. [laugh] That’s the anxiety.”

3/22 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01459740.2017.1416608
U=U (Undetectable equals untransmittable) has also transformed sex for people living with HIV and their partners - see https://www.preventionaccess.org/  - re: international scientific consensus that a person on treatment w/ undetectable viral load CANNOT transmit HIV sexually.

4/22
Aus @ASHMMedia guidelines do not indicate PrEP prescription if only sexual partner has undetectable viral load.

But guidelines do support prescribing for those experiencing HIV anxiety, including in serodiscordant (mixed HIV status) relationships.

5/22
https://ashm.org.au/resources/hiv-resources-list/prep-guidelines-2019/
So what do clinicians providing PrEP think about HIV anxiety? Provider studies have mentioned management of HIV anxiety as part of providing PrEP - clinicians oft uncomfortable prescribing to those with low HIV risk. But rarely explored in-depth.

6/22

http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/apc.2017.0031
This article explores an analysis of 3 themes:

(1) Transforming gay men’s HIV anxiety through PrEP

Clinicians told us how valuable PrEP was in transforming HIV anxiety for gay men, creating "a very different world in sexual health" [P01 SH Nurse]

8/22
For older gay men, clinicians explained that PrEP provided relief from decades of trauma and distress from HIV (Odets)

But also clinicians saw HIV anxiety in younger gay men, and PrEP made them feel more comfortable about being gay.

9/22

https://www.dukeupress.edu/In-the-Shadow-of-the-Epidemic
(2) PrEP as “peace of mind” for serodiscordant couples.

Clinicians iterated U=U, and explained that PrEP was clinically unnecessary unless risk from outside couple. But they also viewed PrEP as beneficial to managing HIV anxiety, including from the HIV positive partner.

10/22
Some speculated about reliability of viral loads, suggesting PrEP might be necessary despite U=U.

A few were worried that providing PrEP 'suggested' to the patient that U doesn't equal U, hinting that it was necessary to prevent intra-couple transmission in context of U=U

11/22
Others emphasised individual prevention, comparing to oral contraception and notion of shared responsibility in managing preventing (not relying solely on U=U), but also ensuring power is equal in relationships.

Educating about U=U as part of prescribing PrEP important!

12/22
(3) Configuring the “worried well": No risk or undisclosed behaviour?

'Worried well' is a poorly defined and problematic term - it privileges physical distress over mental distress and undervalues exp. of anxiety (Gray & co).

13/22 http://bjgp.org/lookup/doi/10.3399/bjgp20X708017
Clinicians found those who reported no/little risk ('worried well') and requesting PrEP frustrating - a waste of clinical resources - and yet this is exactly the type of person who is allowed to be prescribed PrEP under the 'anxiety' provision.

14/22
Clinicians instead felt comfortable with providing PrEP to 'worried well' by imagining they had undisclosed risk - suggesting it clinically necessary to prescribe for this undisclosed risk - so instead of prescribing for anxiety they were prescribing for undisclosed risk.

15/22
These findings suggest that providing PrEP for HIV anxiety is valued by Aus PrEP providers, but HIV anxiety is situated - some types of anxiety (for gay men and for serodiscordant couples) are valued more than for others ('worried well').

16/22
It is promising that Aus clinicians (experienced sample) were enthusiastic about U=U, but suggests that there were some aspects they were unsure of - e.g. reliability of viral loads - and speaks to more complicated dynamics of trust in science and in relationship contexts

19/22
Our concluding remarks:

"PrEP providers [...] ought to provide PrEP in ways that extend beyond preventing HIV, enabling flourishing sexual lives for people [...] recognising pleasure and wellbeing, rather than simply the prevention or treatment of disease."

20/22
And our recommendations

21/22
Thanks to our study advisory panel (see acknowledgements) and the clinicians who took part in our study. 🙏

And thanks to @CSRH_UNSW, my supervisors (co-authors) and to @UNSWArts for funding interview compensation & transcribing

22/22
You can follow @anthonykjsmith.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.