Learning that John Gardner's GRENDEL is a vicious takedown of Sartre makes me understand why I loved it even as a young prog, and already makes even the second page of my reread an order of magnitude funnier than when I first took it in
That's the greatest part of it as art—it's written so that by the end, you *do* pity Grendel. But you also believe the world is made a better place when

~SPOILER ALERT~

Beowulf rips his limbs off and leaves him for dead https://twitter.com/big_brutha/status/1327178356929011712
This is very similar, dramatically, to how Tolkien treats Gollum

But in Tolkien's realm, where Christianity is still in charge, Gollum is also *physically* weak—an object of pity, but overpowered by mere hobbits, once they understand what they're up against
Gardner writes from both a deeper history AND the understanding of what Sartre represents. He gets that this form of chaos is both very old, was once long-defeated, but is being resurrected as something MONSTROUSLY strong—and requires new Beowulfs to rip it limb-from-limb
To put it another way, Tolkien said: Here are our beliefs and our traditions, and if you hold to them, the King will return to restore peace

George RR Martin then said: lol no, all you say is lies, it was always about power, and this is its bloody and awful result
Yet 20 years before Game of Thrones, Gardner held up a black mirror in Grendel, and said No: this is you + your beliefs: you will rip the thin shreds of civilization apart in the name of your godless justice—and be baffled when something emerges that no longer cares to pity you
You can follow @17cShyteposter.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.