Why do some SARS-CoV-2 infections progress to severe COVID-19 while most people remain asymptomatic or have relatively mild symptoms during infection? One way to think about this is to borrow (in a very loose sense) the elegant “two-hit” hypothesis from cancer genetics (2/21)
With respect to COVID-19 pathogenesis, this is very likely a disease that, in most people, arises from multiple “hits”. For example, neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) are likely to be a primary mediator of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 (4/21)
Absence of nAbs is almost certainly a key risk factor for disease progression. Yet not all people who progress to severe COVID-19 lack neutralizing antibodies. Other “hits” can come together to cause severe COVID-19. (5/21)
An inadequate or aberrant response in B cells, T cells, innate immune signaling, cytokine-producing cells such as monocytes and macrophages are all likely to play a role in some subset of severe COVID-19 cases. (6/21)
Yet a deficit in any one of these immune compartments is unlikely to explain all or perhaps even most cases of severe COVID-19. A small glimpse of important studies that describe immune phenotypes that may contribute to some cases of severe COVID-19...:
(7/21)
Now to our current study…

We observed that a subset of severe COVID-19 patients produced antibody types that cause stronger activating/inflammatory cell signaling through receptors that are expressed on a variety of immune cells. (10/21)
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.18.099507.full.pdf

One readout for the activity of afucosylated anti-CoV2 IgG1 is enhanced production of inflammatory cytokines after incubation of CoV2 immune complexes with primary monocytes (12/21).
The presence of these antibodies and associated immune complexes may be one “hit” that tips the balance towards a deleterious amount of inflammation, promoting disease progression in a subset of severe COVID-19 cases. (14/21)
Alternatively, these antibody Fc structures may not be involved in pathogenesis at all -they may simply be a marker of higher risk. Much more work is needed to understand this.(15/21)
Production of these more highly inflammatory antibody forms may be a response to some severe viral infections; they may also be an antecedent to infection in some cases.
(17/21)
A couple of important points:
Our study does not suggest that anti-CoV-2 nAbs for therapeutic use should be “null” for Fc gamma receptor binding. On the contrary, Fc engineering to promote interactions with specific activating FcγRs may well be a useful strategy... (18/21)
Finally, this study definitely does not suggest that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 may be dangerous. Effective vaccines work by eliciting protective immunity that negates the impact of pre-existing “hits” that may cause an individual to be at risk during infection. (20/21)
The emerging data from SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies are extremely encouraging and we eagerly await the opportunity to be vaccinated against this virus. (21/21)
You can follow @LabTaia.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.