Read on Twitter
Can I just try to summarize what I think @roussin_brent is trying to say here? The message seems unclear to people, but may of the questions are expressing frustration but not helping to clarify. In fact, it doesn't need to be complicated. #Covid19MB
* If you don't want people to socialize at all, why does the order say 5 people? Because that's the margin of your personal discretion. Restricting yourself more right now means fewer long-term restriction. That's what the "circuit-breaker" does. Failing that, they must increase.
* We're asking the wrong question (distractions, semantics & loopholes").
Wrong: "Am I allowed to ___?"
Right: "Is there a way to ___ remotely?"
Guideline: if you're not looking for more ways to #StayHome
, you're doing it wrong.
Wrong: "Am I allowed to ___?"
Right: "Is there a way to ___ remotely?"
Guideline: if you're not looking for more ways to #StayHome
, you're doing it wrong.
* If the official order is worded differently, if your neighbour does something differently, forget it and just pay attention to the bottom line: #StayHome
There are good & valid reasons to go out if you *have to*, but if not, stay put with your housemates.
There are good & valid reasons to go out if you *have to*, but if not, stay put with your housemates.
In case there's still any doubt, ignore everything and stay home.
If you're looking for reasons why you don't or shouldn't have to stay home, you're approaching it wrong.
#Covid19MB
If you're looking for reasons why you don't or shouldn't have to stay home, you're approaching it wrong.
#Covid19MB
