Read on Twitter
I hereby re-up my highly unpopular and almost certainly futile campaign to *narrow* rather than broader what’s considered climate policy (1/2) https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/480545-dear-republicans-innovation-isnt-climate-policy
It’s how to pursue critical policies across all sorts of areas (industrial policy, city planning, you name it…) without deluding anyone into thinking these are pathways to deep decarbonization in the absence of actions that directly address emissions (2/2)
Were my campaign to succeed, stories like this become easier: "GOP Leaders Still Oppose Climate Policy."
But, by all means, let's keeping insisting "Dog catcher policy IS climate policy," creating a ridiculous spectrum that everyone claims a spot on. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/heres-what-congressional-republicans-are-thinking-on-climate-following-the-election
But, by all means, let's keeping insisting "Dog catcher policy IS climate policy," creating a ridiculous spectrum that everyone claims a spot on. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/heres-what-congressional-republicans-are-thinking-on-climate-following-the-election
Were my campaign to succeed, stories like this become easier: "Republicans insist they want bipartisan climate legislation, but very few support it."
Instead, it's a messy food fight over different approaches.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/climate/biden-transition-climate-change.html?smid=tw-share
Instead, it's a messy food fight over different approaches.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/climate/biden-transition-climate-change.html?smid=tw-share
