It strikes me how much of the Covid debate is happening outside of the communities most affected by it.
1 in 32 Americans have tested positive; have 1 in 32 people you know tested positive? Has lockdown for you been your storefront shuttered or has it been WFH + Netflix & chill?
1 in 32 Americans have tested positive; have 1 in 32 people you know tested positive? Has lockdown for you been your storefront shuttered or has it been WFH + Netflix & chill?
I don't think I directly know a single person who has tested positive, and my lockdown has been WFH + Netflix (no chill). I know a lot of people in the nonprofit world hurting, but no one whose business has had to close. I do know a lot of people very isolated and depressed.
One problem with Covid debates: we discuss trends broadly but impacts are bifurcated.
Maybe you get a mild illness — or maybe you wind up in ICU and have long-term organ damage.
Depending on your demographic, you probably either know many who've had it — or virtually none.
etc
Maybe you get a mild illness — or maybe you wind up in ICU and have long-term organ damage.
Depending on your demographic, you probably either know many who've had it — or virtually none.
etc
A relatively stable summer, many reasonably wonder "is this worth it?" … then big spikes.
Some countries with brutal restrictions got hit horribly, others that did virtually nothing got off easy … until they didn't.
The virus is uninterested in mood or inductive reasoning.
Some countries with brutal restrictions got hit horribly, others that did virtually nothing got off easy … until they didn't.
The virus is uninterested in mood or inductive reasoning.
Pretty important caveat here: A lot of Covid commentators live in NYC, the worst-hit region of the country. https://twitter.com/jbarro/status/1326723050675564544